<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://purl.org/atom/ns#draft-ietf-atompub-format-03" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><channel><title>Film Critics Awards</title><link>17510171</link><description/><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:01:58 -0800</pubDate><copyright/><webMaster>ineverwonanoscar@earthlink.net</webMaster><generator>Groupee - Eve</generator><item><title>Film Critics Awards - Seems like a Weak Year</title><link>http://goldderbyforums.latimes.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6896049864/m/143105533/r/671100943#671100943</link><author>ainthesky33</author><description>
                           Reply Count: 10</description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:39:21 -0800</pubDate><guid>http://goldderbyforums.latimes.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6896049864/m/143105533/r/671100943#671100943</guid></item><item><title>Film Critics Awards - Film Critics Awards Calender 2009/2010</title><link>http://goldderbyforums.latimes.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6896049864/m/852100053/r/527101053#527101053</link><author>DCurrie</author><description>
                           Reply Count: 1</description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:56:56 -0800</pubDate><guid>http://goldderbyforums.latimes.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6896049864/m/852100053/r/527101053#527101053</guid></item></channel></rss>