Adding: Prince Caspian A- Crystal Skull B+ Iron Man A- Son of Rambow B Stone Angel B (2007 but didnt get here until now) Rambo 2008 B- Mad Money B Untraceable C
This message has been edited. Last edited by: babypook,
Posts: 6201 | Location: canada | Registered: December 22, 2005
Added Iron Man (* * *) and Kung Fu Panda (* * * ½).
"A movie is not good because it arrives at conclusions you share, or bad because it does not. A movie is not about what it is about. It is about how it is about it: about the way it considers its subject matter, and about how its real subject may be quite different from the one it seems to provide." - Roger Ebert, from the introduction to "Awake in the Dark" (2006)
Originally posted by 742: Added Iron Man (* * *) and Kung Fu Panda (* * * ½).
742,
Are you stars out of **** or *****?
My ratings are out of a possible 4 stars.
"A movie is not good because it arrives at conclusions you share, or bad because it does not. A movie is not about what it is about. It is about how it is about it: about the way it considers its subject matter, and about how its real subject may be quite different from the one it seems to provide." - Roger Ebert, from the introduction to "Awake in the Dark" (2006)
"A movie is not good because it arrives at conclusions you share, or bad because it does not. A movie is not about what it is about. It is about how it is about it: about the way it considers its subject matter, and about how its real subject may be quite different from the one it seems to provide." - Roger Ebert, from the introduction to "Awake in the Dark" (2006)
Originally posted by 742: Adding another: Teeth (* * 1/2)
Is that 2008 not a 2007 film?
If so...
Adding:
"Teeth" B+
This kind of movie is confusing. I generally go by the first theatrical distribution. According to IMDb and I think Box Office Mojo as well, this didn't go into release until January, so I'm counting it.
This message has been edited. Last edited by: 742,
"A movie is not good because it arrives at conclusions you share, or bad because it does not. A movie is not about what it is about. It is about how it is about it: about the way it considers its subject matter, and about how its real subject may be quite different from the one it seems to provide." - Roger Ebert, from the introduction to "Awake in the Dark" (2006)
Originally posted by 742: Adding another: Teeth (* * 1/2)
Is that 2008 not a 2007 film?
If so...
Adding:
"Teeth" B+
This kind of movie is confusing. I generally go by the first theatrical distribution. According to IMDb and I think Box Office Mojo as well, this didn't go into release until January, so I'm counting it.
It played in an art theatre in AZ in 2008 but I thought it had played in NY and LA months earlier in 2007. I'm counting it too though.
Posts: 14599 | Location: Phoenix, AZ | Registered: February 02, 2003
