News & Blogs Award Shows Facts & Dates Galleries Forums    
SEARCH:
Search Entire Site
The Envelope    The Envelope Forum    www.goldderbyforums.com  Hop To Forum Categories  Oscars    2009 Gotham Awards Nominations
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Posted
Best Feature

Amreeka
Cherien Dabis, director; Christina Piovesan, Paul Barkin, producers (National Geographic Entertainment)

Big Fan
Robert Siegel, director; Jean Kouremetis, Elan Bogarin, producers (First Independent Pictures)

The Hurt Locker
Kathryn Bigelow, director; Kathryn Bigelow, Mark Boal, Nicolas Chartier, Greg Shapiro, producers (Summit Entertainment)

The Maid
Sebastian Silva, director; Gregorio Gonzàles, producer (Elephant Eye Films)

A Serious Man
Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, directors/producers (Focus Features)


Best Documentary

Food, Inc.
Robert Kenner, director; Robert Kenner, Elise Pearlstein, producers (Magnolia Pictures)

Good Hair
Jeff Stilson, director; Chris Rock, Kevin O'Donnell, Nelson George Jenny Hunter, producers (Liddell Entertainment and Roadside Attractions in association with HBO Films)

My Neighbor My Killer
Anne Aghion, director/producer (Gacaca Productions)

Paradise
Michael Almereyda, director; Michael Almereyda, Laurie Butler, producers (Post Factory Films)

Tyson
James Toback, director; James Toback, Damon Bingham, producers (Sony Pictures Classics)


Best Ensemble Performance

Adventureland
Jesse Eisenberg, Kristen Stewart, Martin Starr, Kristen Wiig, Bill Hader, Ryan Reynolds (Miramax Films)

Cold Souls
Paul Giamatti, Dina Korzun, Emily Watson, Katheryn Winnick, David Strathairn (Samuel Goldwyn Films)

The Hurt Locker
Jeremy Renner, Anthony Mackie, Brian Geraghty, Ralph Fiennes, Guy Pearce, David Morse, Evangeline Lilly (Summit Entertainment)

A Serious Man
Michael Stuhlbarg, Richard Kind, Fred Melamed (Focus Features)

Sugar
Algenis Perez Soto, Rayniel Rufino, Michael Gaston, Andre Holland, Ann Whitney, Richard Bull, Ellary Porterfield, Jaime Tirelli (Sony Pictures Classics)


Breakthrough Director

Cruz Angeles for "Don't Let Me Drown"
Frazer Bradshaw for "Everything Strange and New"
Noah Buschel for "The Missing Person" (Strand Releasing)
Derick Martini for "Lymelife" (Screen Media Films)
Robert Siegel for "Big Fan" (First Independent Pictures)


Breakthrough Actor

Ben Foster in "The Messenger" (Oscilloscope Laboratories)
Patton Oswalt in "Big Fan" (First Independent Pictures)
Jeremy Renner in "The Hurt Locker" (Summit Entertainment)
Catalina Saavedra in "The Maid" (Elephant Eye Films)
Soulémane Sy Savané in "Goodbye Solo" (Roadside Attractions)


Best Film Not Playing at a Theater Near You

Everything Strange and New
Frazer Bradshaw, director; Laura Techera Francia, A.D. Liano, producers

Guy and Madeline on a Park Bench
Damien Chazelle, director; Jasmine McGlade, producer

October Country
Michael Palmieri and Donal Mosher, directors/producers

You Wont Miss Me
Ry Russo-Young, director/producer

Zero Bridge
Tariq Tapa, director; Tariq Tapa, Josée Lajoie, Hilal Ahmed Langoo, producers
 
Posts: 1026 | Registered: September 22, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
The nominating committees were:

Nominating Committee for Best Feature and Best Ensemble Performance:
Rajendra Roy, The Celeste Bartos Chief Curator of Film, Museum of Modern Art
Lisa Schwarzbaum, Film Critic, Entertainment Weekly
Dana Stevens, Film Critic, Slate.com
Kenneth Turan, Film Critic, Los Angeles Times

Nominating Committee for Breakthrough Director and Breakthrough Actor:
Florence Almozini, Program Director, BAMCinématek
Justin Chang, Film Critic, Variety
Rob Nelson, Film Critic, Minnesota Post

Nominating Committee for Best Documentary:
Livia Bloom, Film Curator and editor of Errol Morris: Interviews (University of Mississippi Press)
David Courier, Programmer, Sundance Film Festival
Tom Hall, Director of Programming, Sarasota Film Festival; Artistic Director, Newport International Film Festival; Writer, The Back Row Manifesto (http://blogs,indiewire.com/twhalliii/)
Ronnie Scheib, Film Critic, Variety

Nominating Committee for Best Film Not Playing at a Theater Near You:
Joshua Siegel, Associate Curator, Department of Film and Media, Museum of Modern Art;
and members of the editorial staff of Filmmaker Magazine: Scott Macaulay (Editor-in-Chief), Jason Guerrasio, Brandon Harris, Ray Pride, Alicia Van Couvering
 
Posts: 1026 | Registered: September 22, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
fight for the future of film
Posted Hide Post
Great to see they nominated 'Guy and Madeline on a Park Bench'. I'm impossibly excited for this film.

Kudos on Patton Oswalt's mention too. Another film and performance I'm looking forward to.


fairy

"Notorious was nice, but it’s not in the color purple range"
"Angels and Demons may get nominated for cinematography the imagery was profound"
"District Nine will definitely win for best foreign film it made money and everyone loved it"
~ 8movies
 
Posts: 2714 | Location: nz | Registered: January 12, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
For some reason I get an impression that the lack of Precious in the Gotham nominations is a result of the Oprah/Tyler Perry connection. Not so much a backlash but more of a "let's honor films that we know will be forgotten in awards season" sort of way. Because with the people Precious has behind, it's not really an indie anymore. And we all know the fire thrown at the Gothams when The Departed was nominated.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Jilpen,
 
Posts: 309 | Registered: June 11, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jilpen:
For some reason I get an impression that the lack of Precious in the Gotham nominations is a result of the Oprah/Tyler Perry connection. Not so much a backlash but more of a "let's honor films that we know will be forgotten in awards season" sort of way. Because with the people Precious has behind, it's not really an indie anymore. And we all know the fire thrown at the Gothams when The Departed was nominated.


Yes, I tend to agree; although I tend to think it's more of a backlash, but it may not be as malicious as that and just wanting to spread the wealth around to other pictures.

However, I must add, Adventureland for Best Ensemble Peformance?!? That film being nominated makes me feel like they left out Precious maliciously because really, um, there weren't any better ensembles out there than that film?!?

Also, no Gabourey Siddibe for Breakthrough Actor? I get if they didn't want to honor the rest of the film, but to me it doesn't make any sense to leave Siddibe out since she and Carey Mulligan are likely to take most of the breakthrough actor type of awards this year. I guess one could argue that they ignored Siddibe too because the movie isn't really an independent anymore, but with Siddibe being such a newcomer, I would think she needs all the help that she could get to bring attention to her performance.
 
Posts: 929 | Registered: May 22, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
I think Adventureland was one of the more underrated films and ensembles of the year...it's definitely part of spreading the wealth. I think it deserved it.
 
Posts: 309 | Registered: June 11, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
fight for the future of film
Posted Hide Post
I think Gotham likes to focus on films that really wouldn't get much awards attention otherwise. I'm actually quite pleased they didn't nominate Precious - it doesn't need their support, and it will be recognized at pretty much every other voting body. It shows gumption on their part.


fairy

"Notorious was nice, but it’s not in the color purple range"
"Angels and Demons may get nominated for cinematography the imagery was profound"
"District Nine will definitely win for best foreign film it made money and everyone loved it"
~ 8movies
 
Posts: 2714 | Location: nz | Registered: January 12, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
do androids dream of electric sheep?
Posted Hide Post
If this is the case, I wonder why The Hurt Locker, A Serious Man, Food Inc, Tyson, Jeremy Renner, and arguably, a couple of others are mentioned?
 
Posts: 13909 | Location: canada | Registered: December 22, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Like I said, Precious probably has more to do with it's lack of an indie feel anymore. It's too hyped and has too much of a mainstream backing. It won't struggle to get an audience like some of the nominees and isn't so different that it will scare people away. It's known and will be known throughtout the season by the richest woman in the country. The other films, for the most part, have stuck to their initial roots.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Jilpen,
 
Posts: 309 | Registered: June 11, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Not always right, but no fool either
Posted Hide Post
Or maybe Lisa Schwartzbaum and Kenny Turan aren't big fans, which could indicate a more mixed critical reaction then expected.
 
Posts: 17512 | Registered: January 26, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
That's possible too. But a lot of the more mainstream indie films have missed out on the Gotham nominations. At least in the Feature category. And since most of the other nominees probably have less of shot at any Oscar nominations, it's very possible they do really like Precious but they like these smaller profile films about the same or more and rewarded them because they can.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Jilpen,
 
Posts: 309 | Registered: June 11, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Backlash begins... even before the film gets released. Miss Oprah shan't be pleased.
 
Posts: 6193 | Registered: July 05, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
do androids dream of electric sheep?
Posted Hide Post
It's premature to call this set back a backlash, I'd think.
But it's interesting how it's snub here is being explained away.
Precious could easily be swept up in sweeping accolades, the way Slumdog was last year. Or maybe not. But I dont want to give too much credit to the voting members, seeing as how, their choice of winners is dominated by dozens of other factors besides the actual merit of the work.
 
Posts: 13909 | Location: canada | Registered: December 22, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Not always right, but no fool either
Posted Hide Post
I am mildly a fan of SM, but hardly a big supporter, but for the record, SM won last year because it was beloved by Academy members and embraced by them as few best picture winners ever have been. They loved it. When the public embraced it as well (the only other factor that mattered), it became a lock.
 
Posts: 17512 | Registered: January 26, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
do androids dream of electric sheep?
Posted Hide Post
It was like a runaway train, where even the ensemble cast was swept into SAG.
I really liked the kids in the film. Each set of them.
 
Posts: 13909 | Location: canada | Registered: December 22, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by seanflynn:
I am mildly a fan of SM, but hardly a big supporter, but for the record, SM won last year because it was beloved by Academy members and embraced by them as few best picture winners ever have been. They loved it. When the public embraced it as well (the only other factor that mattered), it became a lock.


These, of course, are the same "professionals" who voted Crash best picture over Brokeback Mountain.

(Did I just say that aloud?)
 
Posts: 6193 | Registered: July 05, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
There's no place like Hollyweird.
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pucifer:
quote:
Originally posted by seanflynn:
I am mildly a fan of SM, but hardly a big supporter, but for the record, SM won last year because it was beloved by Academy members and embraced by them as few best picture winners ever have been. They loved it. When the public embraced it as well (the only other factor that mattered), it became a lock.


These, of course, are the same "professionals" who voted Crash best picture over Brokeback Mountain.

(Did I just say that aloud?)


I heard you all the way here in Michigan! nana

But anyway, I couldn't agree more bro.
 
Posts: 1040 | Location: Ann Arbor, MI | Registered: February 18, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
HSX Goddess
Posted Hide Post
I am happy for The Hurt Locker.

A Serious Man is expected.

I'm ecstatic for Jeremy Renner (Hurt Locker)
and Ben Foster (The Messenger)!
Awesome news. sohappy

This message has been edited. Last edited by: MicheBel,


****************************
Check out my showbiz show at http://michebelzhollywood.mevio.com, my erotic podcast at http://whisperedpearls2.mevio.com, my erotic audiobook at http://goldenpath.mevio.com TWITTER: michebella BLIP.fm: michebel ********* Oscars FYC: The Messenger!
 
Posts: 7139 | Location: In Tinseltown, waiting for Oscars. | Registered: July 20, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

The Envelope    The Envelope Forum    www.goldderbyforums.com  Hop To Forum Categories  Oscars    2009 Gotham Awards Nominations

© Los Angeles Times 2007

Gold Derby
The Dish Rag
Extended Play